Predatory King

Authors

  • Encarna García Monerris Universitat de València
  • Carmen García Monerris Universitat de València

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17811/hc.v0i18.479

Keywords:

Absolutism, Royal House, Despotism, Royal Heritage, Fernando VII, Private Jurisdiction

Abstract

The decision of Ferdinand VII in 1814 to radically separate the affairs and government of his Royal House and Heritage from the most general of the Treasury and the State has often been interpreted as a manifestation of administrative rationality. Far from that, the work shows how this act was the beginning of the assets drift, even with a privatizing character, on the set of goods that constituted the historical Royal Patrimony. This last was tried to been nationalized by the liberals in accordance with their sovereign principles. The heritage drift was especially intense in the territories of the ancient Crown of Aragon. The analysis would approach to an original characterization of the nature of a postrevolutionary new absolutism, absolutely not understandable to the overcome Eighteenth Century absolutism.

Enviado el (Submission Date): 03/03/2017

Aceptado el (Acceptance Date): 12/05/2017

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Encarna García Monerris, Universitat de València

Profesora Titular del Departamento de Historia Moderna y Contemporánea, Universitat de València

Carmen García Monerris, Universitat de València

Catedrática del Departamento de Historia Moderna y Contemporánea, Universitat de València

Downloads

Published

2017-05-12

Issue

No. 18 (2017): Historia Constitucional N. 18 (2017)

Section

Spain

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. Journal can use the published works for future publications.
  5. Authors must inform the journal of later publications of their text.